Tuesday, July 28, 2026
HomeCYBERSECUIRTY NEWSManaging risks from third parties with TPRM is mis-aligned: EY survey

Managing risks from third parties with TPRM is mis-aligned: EY survey

The 2025 EY Global Third-Party Risk Management Survey reveals new approaches to managing risks from third parties in a more volatile environment.

  • Risk leaders are using AI and centralization to fundamentally transform their third-party risk management functions for the future.
  • Business uncertainty and cost pressures are driving efficiency imperatives for third-party risk management

A confluence of trends has shaken up the external risk environment in recent years. Global supply chains have been buffeted by repeated shocks — precipitated by the pandemic, geopolitical conflicts and climate change — drawing greater attention to the resilience of suppliers and potential third-party impacts.

The rising number of cyberattacks — the IMF estimates that losses from cyberattacks have more than doubled since the pandemic and more than quadrupled since 2017 — has increased the potential for cyber risk via third-party relationships.

Heightened regulatory scrutiny and stakeholder pressures have brought increased focus on third-party practices related to a host of compliance risks, ranging from data privacy to environmental standards.

EY survey report:

  • Operational risk is the most common concern when it comes to third-party risk management (TPRM), according to a recent EY survey of 500 executives at major companies. According to the study, today’s TPRM is “is fundamentally misaligned with this new risk environment.”
  • Financial, cybersecurity, privacy, and regulatory risks rounded out the top five concerns about third parties that executives cited.
  • The data reflect growing corporate worries about the consequences of hiring subcontractors with negligent security or privacy practices.
  • These worries have been heightened in the wake of many high-profile cyberattacks that involved supply chain or third-party compromises.
  • The survey reveals that companies are changing the way they define a critical third party, an important consideration when mapping out dependencies.
  • While ‘financial impact’ remains the most important criterion used to define a critical third party (43%),” the report said, “this is closely followed by ‘criticality of the business process/function,’ at 39%.

The report further says Operational and cybersecurity risks are growing while the number and complexity of third-party relationships increases .

 

Amy Gennarini EY Global Risk Consulting Technology Leader says

Approaches are increasingly misaligned with today’s competing demands and complex risk environment. TPRM has never been more ripe for transformation.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -
Google search engine

Most Popular

Recent Comments